Scroll to Top

Volume : IV, Issue : V, June - 2014

CONSTRUCTIVISM IN TEACHING-LEARNING: A PARADIGM SHIFT IN INDIAN CLASSROOMS

Anand Valmiki, None

By : Laxmi Book Publication

Abstract :

Although constructivism is a concept that has been embraced my many teachers over the past 10 years, the meanings that are attached to this term are varied and often inadequately understood. Teachers need to have a sound understanding of what constructivism means to evaluate its promise and to use it knowledgeably and effectively. This paper explicates some of the theoretical background of constructivism and then presents as what teachers need to know to make their classroom to shift towards constructivism.

Keywords :


    Article :


    Cite This Article :

    Anand Valmiki, None(2014). CONSTRUCTIVISM IN TEACHING-LEARNING: A PARADIGM SHIFT IN INDIAN CLASSROOMS. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. IV, Issue. V, http://isrj.org/UploadedData/8232.pdf

    References :

    1. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. (1999). The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69 (2), 147-188.
    2. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R. (Eds). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Acadamy Press. Washington, DC.
    3. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. (1999). The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69 (2), 147-188.
    4. Farrugia P., Petrisor B., Farrokhyar F., Bhandari M. Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Can J Surg 2010; 53:278-281
    5. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. (1999). The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69 (2), 147-188.
    6. Bloom, S. Benjimen (1956). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, David Mc Kay, New York.
    7. Broekkamp, H. (2002). Task demands and test expectations [Dissertation]. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
    8. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R. (Eds). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Acadamy Press. Washington, DC.
    9. Agarwal, R. Enriching The Elementary Education with Constructivist Approach. Retrieved from http://www.aiaer.net/ejournal/vol22110/4.pdf
    10. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R. (Eds). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Acadamy Press. Washington, DC.
    11. Agarwal, R. Enriching The Elementary Education with Constructivist Approach. Retrieved from http://www.aiaer.net/ejournal/vol22110/4.pdf
    12. Bloom, S. Benjimen (1956). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, David Mc Kay, New York.
    13. Broekkamp, H. (2002). Task demands and test expectations [Dissertation]. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
    14. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R. (Eds). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Acadamy Press. Washington, DC.
    15. Farrugia P., Petrisor B., Farrokhyar F., Bhandari M. Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Can J Surg 2010; 53:278-281
    16. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. (1999). The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69 (2), 147-188.
    17. Agarwal, R. Enriching The Elementary Education with Constructivist Approach. Retrieved from http://www.aiaer.net/ejournal/vol22110/4.pdf
    18. Bloom, S. Benjimen (1956). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, David Mc Kay, New York.
    19. Broekkamp, H. (2002). Task demands and test expectations [Dissertation]. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
    20. Farrugia P., Petrisor B., Farrokhyar F., Bhandari M. Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Can J Surg 2010; 53:278-281
    21. Farrugia P., Petrisor B., Farrokhyar F., Bhandari M. Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Can J Surg 2010; 53:278-281
    22. Bloom, S. Benjimen (1956). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, David Mc Kay, New York.
    23. Broekkamp, H. (2002). Task demands and test expectations [Dissertation]. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
    24. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R. (Eds). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Acadamy Press. Washington, DC.
    25. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. (1999). The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69 (2), 147-188.
    26. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R. (Eds). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Acadamy Press. Washington, DC.
    27. Farrugia P., Petrisor B., Farrokhyar F., Bhandari M. Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Can J Surg 2010; 53:278-281
    28. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R. (Eds). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Acadamy Press. Washington, DC.
    29. Agarwal, R. Enriching The Elementary Education with Constructivist Approach. Retrieved from http://www.aiaer.net/ejournal/vol22110/4.pdf
    30. Bloom, S. Benjimen (1956). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, David Mc Kay, New York.
    31. Broekkamp, H. (2002). Task demands and test expectations [Dissertation]. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
    32. Farrugia P., Petrisor B., Farrokhyar F., Bhandari M. Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Can J Surg 2010; 53:278-281
    33. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. (1999). The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69 (2), 147-188.

    Article Post Production

      No data exists for the row/column.
    Creative Commons License
    Indian Streams Research Journal by Laxmi Book Publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    Based on a work at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx.
    Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx
    Copyright � 2014 Indian Streams Research Journal. All rights reserved
    Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap, or contact ISRJ
    Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Plagairism Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use